A question I seem to get quite a bit these days from my clients is " What is the difference between short sales and REO's?" I then , usually, go into a whole explanation of the pro's and con's of each, and end up telling them that REO's are superior in every way. I have a couple of dealings over the past couple of months that really bring this point home.
The first case involves a really neat family I have been dealing with for over a year. They are from North Hollywood and have wanted to buy a place up here for a long time. When we initially looked, we couldn't find anything that really fitted their needs. They decided to wait a year and then take a look when the prices had really dropped. So, I took them out a couple of months ago and found a cabin that was perfect for them. The cabin is super clean and situated on a great lot with a ton of beautiful oak trees. Even at the $149,900 price tag, it was a great deal. The one big problem with it was it being a short sale listing. I warned them of the major hassles that usually accompany buying a short sale, but they liked the house enough to risk it.
As many of you know, the majority of short sales do not close successfully. This is usually due to the listing agent not knowing how to do them, but taking the listing anyways. If the listing agent doesn't put in all the work ahead of time, a short sale is a nightmare. In this case, the listing agent assured me that he had done all the footwork and the bank was ready to move. With this information, we decided to offer $120,000 cash for the cabin, knowing it would probably be refused and we would have to come up to make the purchase.
A month into the process we still hadn't heard back from the bank. At this point I was fairly certain the listing agent was full of it and hadn't really done what he needed to do to get a short sale done. I told my clients that all we could really do was wait and see what the bank would do. After a month and a half, the listing agent called me to say that the bank had just taken the listing away from him and never gave us an answer. I knew sooner than later, I would be seeing the home again as a bank owned listing. I told my clients to hang tight and that I would check the MLS everyday until it appeared.
Sure enough, a week and a half later it came on The MLS for $130,000 as a bank owned property. I called my clients the minute I saw it and we wrote an offer for $115,000 cash. The bank came back the next day at $117,000 cash and we snatched it up. Not only that, but the bank repaired some broken pipes under the house that the original owner most likely would not have been able to afford to do. Basically, the bank took a month and a half and did nothing when it was a short sale. Once it was a bank owned, we bought it in two days for less money and had repairs thrown in as a bonus. Bank owned One, Short sales Zero.
The second situation is very similar. My clients put in an offer of $340,000 on a short sale listed at $389,000. Again, we waited patiently for almost two months while the bank had the home reappraised and numerous BPO's done. In the end, after two months, they rejected our offer and let the home go into foreclosure. Like the last time, I watched the MLS and saw the home come up as a bank owned property for $390,000. My clients and I both felt the home was overpriced and we should wait and watch it to see if it would reduce. After two weeks, it hadn't sold and we decided to make our move. We came in at $333,000, and waited for a response from the bank. This time it took one day to get their answer, which was no. After a week of wrangling, we put the home into escrow for $339,000. So, we got a lower price in only a week when it was bank owned. Bank Owned Two, Short Sales Zero.